Friday, December 21, 2012

When truth is stranger than fiction -- how Flight 93 may relate to the recent school shootings


When truth is stranger than fiction -- how Flight 93 may relate to the recent school shootings
Posted By: Patriotlad [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 21-Dec-2012 18:15:54
21 December A.D. 2012
What follows is an updated version:
"hollywood" is deliberately not capitalized.
We can think of that as an economic statement in the very same way that "irs" is not capitalized in my writings, and for the very same economic statement/reasons.

by Harmon Taylor

Lots of information from lots of sources on some of these (alleged) mass shootings.
There's no question that the agenda in Washington is to disarm America.
This author has accepted as true the "motive" for Aurora, and now Sandy Hook, as being retaliatory strikes against family members of those testifying about and exposing the Libor interest-rate-fixing criminal conspiracy affecting banking activity the world over.

[ Update comment: Libor, sometimes LIBOR, means London Interbank Offered Rate.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/libor.asp. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIBOR; http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest-rates/libor.aspx; and http://www.economist.com/node/21558281.

A generic internet search for "libor scandal" should produce a number of discussions on this matter. ]

This author has accepted as true that those involved at the very top with such plots are deranged occultists who just can't get enough kiddie-porn or child sacrifice.
Toward that end, this author has (all too?) readily accepted as true that when the news pundits tell us there's been a shooting, it actually happened. Surely they have access to the information that would satisfy us, if we were there, that such actually occurred.
That said, there is a perspective associated with the shooting in Aurora (Batman, movie theatre) and now also with the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting that the events are very well staged and acted. This note exists to make known that such perspective exists and persists and to explore whether there's any logical, practical reason why one should entertain such perspective, at all.
Initially, the perspective that such media sensations as the (alleged) mass shooting at the movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado and now of the (alleged) mass shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School could in any way be "staged," fabricated, hoaxes at the extreme level, seems so outrageously impossible as to be dismissed immediately. How could there possibly be "so many people involved" in such a scam as a mass shooting and there not be a leak somewhere? This is one of the great arguments associated with the "truth or fiction" analysis of the (alleged) moon landings. If it's not true, how could there be so many people involved in that particular lie and it not leak out?
What about the JFK and RFK assassinations? For the JFK assassination plot to work, the driver, allegedly a member of the Secret Service, would have to slow the car down in the kill zone for all the shooters to make successful shots. The car did stay at that kill zone speed all the way through the kill zone, and still there were all kinds of missed shots.
Regarding RFK, the shot that killed RFK was to the back of his head, behind his ear, which means that the Secret Service had to be involved in that murder, as well. No one else was behind him in the hotel's kitchen.
But, where even part of the Secret Service are involved in those murders, as is also the case for the attempted murder of Reagan, who told the world that he didn't feel anything until after he was in the car, under the (alleged) Secret Service agent, at which particular instant/moment, it felt like he had a broken rib, we still deal with the reality that such facts are so obvious and yet so "not talked about" that the lies we've been fed stand relatively unchallenged in popular "thinking" and "coverage" on those matters. There are any number of people involved, including the "commissions" set up "to investigate," and all the staff people for those "commissions," in those still persistent cover-up activities. "We" know what has to be the case. "We" know what the facts are. But "the government" holds to their original lies. (Remember this perspective as all the voter fraud and election fraud stories continue to circulate. The puppetmasters who pick and choose the key public officials well before any elections take place just can't take any chances of letting non-complying members into those critical public offices. There are just too many skeletons in those closets.)

[ Update comment: This author has received word from an informed source that the Secret Service didn't protect presidential candidates at the time of RFK's assassination. Thus, this author has misapplied the "credit" for failure of protection, thus of murder, of RFK to the Secret Service. (No apologies offered, though, given their participation in other murders and cover ups.) The credit for the murder of RFK actually belongs to the CIA and to the LAPD.]

Further, as is the setting with "The Sting," "Hogan's Heroes," "Ocean's 11," "Ocean's 12," and "Ocean's 13," "Burn Notice," the relatively recent tv series, "Leverage," and no doubt several other such stories, there's a whole team of people involved in the set-up. But, that's hollywood.

What about a scam, a "made-for-tv-movie" setting, a hoax so huge that it also involves the doctors, nurses, and medical staff allegedly treating shooting victims? That's a lot of seemingly independent, unrelated people to have all acting from the same script.
If such events are world-class hoaxes, scams, fictions, from where would the participants come? What could possibly keep the whole team from spilling the beans? How could that entire scenario possibly be controlled enough to pull off a scam of such huge proportions?
Think "French underground," and we'll headed toward one possible, very real, very practical explanation of that part of the puzzle. Of course, at least a number of participants in the French underground were caught and executed. So, it's not the best analogy, but the point is that there's no problem coming up with a (very large) group of people who would want to perpetuate such outrageous, sick, sadistic scams against and on the American people. McCarthy would know exactly where to start. Anyone who has seen "Obama's America: 2016," http://2016themovie.com/, knows that obama is a communist at heart. To understand why FDR did what he did starts with understanding that FDR was a communist at heart.
Always keep in mind that when God raises up a "Beast" system, He doesn't mess around. There's the "funny money" angle, which is at the heart of the present "Beast" system, and which "life blood" of the European banking cartels system may start an unstoppable, Heparin-overdose-appearing hemorrhage come January 1, 2013. If it turns out to be the case that "treasury bills," i.e., "US notes," start to circulate, then the grave marker for the "federal reserve system" and it's "at interest" "funny money" system has already been ordered and delivered; it awaits only the day of its positioning over the grave of the "federal reserve system."
In addition to the "funny money" angle, by which the "choice of law" is controlled, there's also the "communist" angle. What influence could possibly want to see God removed from the schools? From sporting events? From public gatherings? The "fingerprint" of God-hating, America-hating "communism" is all over these events and developments within the legal policy in place at present in America. What influence could possibly want to disarm America? The same influence that has promoted disarmament in several nations in history. This author labels it as Nazi-communo-fascist. There are emails circulating about who has, in history, approved of the insanity of disarming the people, and they are a who's who list of communists and fascists.

When God raises up a "Beast" system against His rebellious people, He doesn't mess around.

So, to the application thought of focus, we get to this question ....

Are there enough "communists" (Nazi-communo-fascists) in the nation or possible to recruit from places outside of this nation to form/create/establish/maintain a "communist underground" from which pool of minds/people could be drawn enough people to run the scams on the Cecil-B-DeMille-sized scale we're talking about, here? Sure. Of course there are.
Let's take this study one more step down that path. It happens that Connecticut is one of the most communist-leaning STATEs in the nation at present (to the horrific shock and amazement of those who have ancestry that dates all the way back to the founding of this nation). Anyone still happen to remember Kelo v. City of New London, where the "government" "took" land from a family, who had owned that land for something like 100 years at that point, under the theory of "eminent domain?" New London is a community in Connecticut.
What is the geographic origin of the Heller case, in which the ordinance existed that intended to render self-defense of and in one's own domicile illegal? Washington, DC.
What is the geographic origin of the "chemical weapons ban treaty"-based homicide charge against a woman named BOND? Pennsylvania (a long-time "blue" (democratic party supporting) state). (As has been said before, and as is said here, again, and as will likely be said again in the future, that case, while marketed as a 10th Amendment case, is a Structural Due Process case -- who is going to define the crimes for any STATE: that STATE's legislature or a group of international parties who sign some treaty or other?
Could cooperating (Nazi-communo-fascist) nations, by simply agreeing to something, overrule a STATE's legislative authority and take over a STATE's, or all STATEs', authority to define and punish crime? The Supreme Court is holding off the enormous push for the latter, but we could sure provide them some support by no longer contributing to that Nazi-communo-fascist agenda -- how is that accomplished? by reducing down to zero the number of transactions for which we use "funny money.")
This STATE-oriented political leanings analogy can't be taken too far, in that while there was a suspicious shooting in Arizona, a predominately conservative leaning STATE, Colorado is, during the four previous elections, mixed in its voting record as kept for national election statistics. (Colorado is the "home state" for both the Columbine shooting, regarding which we were fed nothing but lies, and for the recent Aurora shooting, an event of focus in this note.) Not that this author believes for one instant that these statistics of voting in any way, shape, manner, or form reflect any vote for which any "electronic voting machine" was used in the voting process, the movers and shakers can't go too far overboard in misrepresenting the thinking of the people in this nation. So, it's an interesting parallel between these communist-leaning political efforts, including disarmament, and the alleged political-leaning of the majority vote in that STATE/community.
With all that in mind, the question that has caught this author's attention in both of those recent events, Aurora and Sandy Hook, is a simple one: Where are the bodies?
We're told a number, and sometimes we're given names. We're told how some of them died, i.e., where they were injured and by what cause/force. That tends to suggest that there were, in fact, cadavers produced by the events. There may have been some cadavers produced, but is there a cadaver for each number and name reported?
Thus, that question, "Where are the bodies?" is one that has to be addressed. It has an all-too-familiar ring to it, in that there were "no bodies" at the alleged crash site of Flight 93 (S-11, Shanksville, Pennsylvania).
Regarding S-11, there certainly seemed to be people jumping out of the Twin Towers. That shows up on videos. We know that any form of information transfer may be fabricated, so surely there's evidence of where those people hit the ground. (This author hasn't looked for such, so this author presumes that such exists.)
This author has concluded that there really were people who died in that part of the S-11 events. But, there were "no bodies" at/near Shanksville. How do we know? The coroner for that community told us that information that very morning, and this author accepts that person as a credible witness. That plus the fact that the video coverage, presumed to be unfabricated, also shows "no bodies."
As a direct follow-on to the reality that there were "no bodies" associated with the alleged crash site of (alleged) Flight 93, there still persists the concept, for which, if memory serves, a "movie" was made, that some passengers rushed the alleged box-cutter-wielding hijackers thus causing, or contributing to the cause of, the crash of Flight 93. This author fully remembers seeing on network tv broadcasts the video (picture) feed, "live," of a "family gathering" at the broadcast studio of those family members of those who had allegedly rushed the box-cutter-wielding hijackers and died so heroically in that crash.
Where there were no passengers, and no crash, and, no plane, at all, associated with Shanksville, thus also no hijackers, from where, then, came those folks who were presented to America, live, allegedly from the broadcast studio, as surviving family members of those hijacker-rushing people?
This author saw that "group gathering" photo-op that one time, i.e., not before and not since. One person's exposure to, experience with, that particular angle on the matter may not mean anything. This author "knew" they had to be actors IF the rest of the evidence, including, in particular, "no bodies," is true and reliable. As it stands, this author accepts as true that there were "no bodies," thus no hijackers and no plane (crash), in the alleged "crash" scene at Shanksville marketed to the world as part of the S-11 events. Therefore, this author accepts as true that the tv network(s) either did the staging or were dupes for the staging of that story.
If there were surviving family members, then of course, there were deaths from the crash of Flight 93. But, there were "no bodies."
Hence, there was no crash; there were no passengers; there were no box-cutter-wielding hijackers; in short, "everything" we've been told via the "official" sources about Flight 93 is a pure fabrication. Everything, including the allegation of surviving family members. Therefore, those people posing as surviving family members were actors/actresses.
It happens that theatres may be rented out for "special events." This author hasn't heard any evidence either way that such was the case in Aurora, Colorado. Opening event for the movie -- not likely that the theatre was reserved by any particular group. But, nothing prevents a group of people from standing in line (together) and sitting in a particular spot in the theatre in order to pull off that hoax, if it is, in fact, a hoax. The weapons allegedly planted inside the theatre could easily have been taken in and planted by a team member, whether someone conveniently in the theatre's employ or a movie-goer.
This author is not yet up to concluding that Aurora was a hoax. He is, however, keeping in mind the reality that it's fully possible for the news to report "bodies" and "deaths" that just flat never happened. There are still too many more angles necessary to "cover," including the medical staff allegedly treating wounds, before this author will be in a position to conclude that there was, in fact, no bullets, no blood, and no bodies. But, since the question has been asked, "Where are the bodies?" there needs to be some confirmation of such. (When the answer comes back, Yes, of course there are/were bodies, without something akin to what is provided for us via "Best Evidence" regarding the JFK assassination in the way of photographs of the cadaver, how far into the background of that witness do we check in order to satisfy ourselves of that witness's credibility?) It's an extremely basic legal point: what constitutes credible evidence? That's always a "jury question."
Update comment:
This author has been reminded of the drowning death of one of the nurses involved in handling the Aurora shooting victims' injuries. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/20/jennifer-gallagher-aurora-nurse-dies-iowa_n_1813256.html; http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57496277/nurse-who-treated-aurora-victims-drowns-in-iowa/.
There may be more to that, and there may be nothing to that. An investigation for another time.]
As the question of "Where are the bodies?" has also been raised regarding Sandy Point, it's very tough to know how to answer it. Which is the scam/hoax side of the matter -- the controlled media, clearly a pravda outlet for the Nazi-communo-fascist agenda that prevails in DC, or those who raise that question without much more to it than having raised the question? There is a comment that the caskets are closed and that the parents are not "being allowed" to see the bodies of their children.
If the entire community is filled with actors/actresses participating in a horrific hoax, what would be expect to hear from them? They would have to remain in character. Thus, what third-party source could provide information that would resolve the matter either way? And, where all the DNA and blood and dental "evidence" comes back in support of the media's story, how far into that line of information must one dig to verify that the correct initial information is what's being used, i.e., that the base-line information hasn't been tampered with?
[Update comment: In response to this part of this discussion, a reader in the general locale of the Sandy Point crime scene, who has high credibility as an analyst of such matters, is satisfied that the information provided via the news reporting locally, in Connecticut, confirms that there really were cadavers produced as a result of that shooting. Thus, at least for the Sandy Point crime scene, the question of, "Where are the bodies?" has been addressed by the showing of such in the local news in Connecticut.]
Among all the mystery that shrouds such matters, one thing is of no mystery. We're dealing with a "Beast" system. Having just detailed that concept and the origin of the connection between God's Judgment and just such a system in a three-part discussion, what will be stated here is the conclusion side of the matter.
Once we see that we're dealing with a "Beast" system that intends to disarm us, the reality or hoax nature of those events takes a little less energy out of our day. Whether there really is an attack against those testifying about and exposing the Libor scam, and whether there really are mass shootings and horrific deaths as "control" measures by those intent on keeping a Libor scam on track and unprosecuted, is secondary to the political agenda of disarmament that is being furthered by such stories.
Key to disarmament is the concept of War. War is a Judgment. Where the Nazi-communo-fascist-agenda-supporting War-mongers intend to try to complete their coup de etat of America, one way or another, the thing to keep in mind that is no War prosecuted by God can be stopped, where no War defended by God can progress.
There were "no bodies" in Shanksville. There may or may not be any actual bodies associated with the Aurora shooting or the Sandy Hook shooting. But, rest very much assured that if this nation is provoked into any type of War, domestic in nature, against this "Beast" system, which exists to devour and destroy the rebellious, there will most assuredly be bodies.
The simple statistics are these. There's no nation on the planet more armed than this one. No Nazi-communo-fascist think tank has overlooked that fact. Those who chip themselves or their kids will do so voluntarily. Those who get immunizations will do so voluntarily. Those who disarm themselves will do so voluntarily. Until there is de facto house-to-house activity forcing disarmament, it's still all "just talk." If there's one thing that Washington is good at, it's running a bluff.
We need to try very hard to see the bluff for what it is. Is Aurora also a bluff? Is Sandy Hook another aspect of the bluff? There are suicide bombers, and there are shootings that produce cadavers, but not everything reported as a suicide bombing is a suicide bombing, and not everything reported as a mass shooting may turn out to be a mass shooting. Thus, is either of these events real or is either a hoax? Those right there on the scene "know" which it is, and as for the rest of us, the sooner we inquire of God, as David did, as to why He's inundating us with War, Famine, Pestilence (Disease, Plague) and this "Beast" system, and the sooner we come to terms with and implement, individually, the changes in thought, thus activity, that God is rather much compelling us to make, over which we have individual control, at best, hence the reason for His Judgments in the first place, the sooner the "power" that feeds this "Beast" system ends.
Not necessarily comfortable to have to "preach" on, but something that has to be taught and "preached," is that events told to us as having Scriptural origins that have nothing to do with Scripture and that are actually very pagan in origin, e.g., Lent, Easter, and Christmas, are this author's suggested starting place(s) for the change of mind, thus of activity, the perpetuation of which pagan activities has contributed to the existence of God's wrath, hence, His Judgments, including all of War, Famine, Pestilence (Disease, Plague), and "Beasts." Of course, this author can't say enough that another thing that has to change is the use of the European banking cartel's "funny money." The "kings of the rising sun" ("kings of the east") (Rev. 16) may already have provided a huge part of the solution to this problem. We'll know come Jan. 1, 2013, where that development stands.

There are three "birthday celebration" events in Scripture. The "third" one (chronologically, the second one) is the massacre of the innocent under Herod's command when he realized that those visiting Messiah upon the news of His birth hadn't returned to Herod to tell him about anything. Thus, child sacrifice is a very real part of that which is associated with the birth of Messiah, for those who exist to defy and deny His Messiah-ship.
If there really are bodies, i.e., if children truly were massacred in Connecticut, at the hand of the Nazi-communo-fascist-agenda-based "Beast" system, as has been reported, then it may already make sense that the longer we feed the "Beast" by defying God, the more of those sorts of events will occur.

When God raises up a "Beast," He doesn't mess around.

By executing His Judgments, He's telling us that He expects change, i.e., repentance.

Where we have control over something, and we definitely have at least the responsibility to exercise control over ourselves, He expects us to exercise that control. To see the Judgments is to have Notice.

To have Notice is to recognize that the opportunity for change, via repentance, is still being extended to us.
Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas


http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=264030

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Forgive me if I am presumptuous in my thinking. I read all the way until the writer started talking about no cadavers...no cadavers in Shanksville, PA. I happened upon the wreckage of a LIGHT plane that crashed years ago in a field not too long after it happened. It is characteristic of a plane crash to have little, if anything, remaining. There were no bodies! None! In fact, there was very little of ANYTHING. There was an engine, molars from someones' mouths scattered here and there, a shoe or two with a sock still draped in it without a foot...no bodies. Most of the plane had been evidently "plowed" so deep into the earth on impact that there was almost no evidence left except smoke and wreckage scattered far and wide much like if you threw a hamburger patty up against a brick wall. What would be left? We need to be careful about drawing conclusions when using fscts we know little or nothing about.

Anonymous said...

Oh, God help us. What is the point of this article? This is so Old Testament thinking! And, this person really does not know God. God did not create any "beast system." This is ascribing evil to God's ways and this just isn't so. No wonder people are turned off to our Divine Father Creator.

God may have allowed Jesus to be sacrificed on the cross, but Jesus was not a child sacrifice. Jesus willingly did this to purchase our passage into a heavenly realm we would not otherwise have had access to because of the nature of this world and our unfortunate part in it. Jesus was not meant to be anybody's shotgun wedding. We are free to choose--and this includes the godless. Those of us who know and love God are ccompletely mystified by those who willing choose to serve darkness. There is no real love or change in a shotgun wedding, and this is what forcing repentence with fear and intimidation leads to. Jesus was also one of the best "law of attraction" teachers. He changed lives through love, not punishment.

Domination, intimidation and manipulation are the spirits of witchcraft, or the Jezebel spirit. These are tools of evil, not tools of God. Only the nature of evil that is still part of this world created the "beast system." God does not force repentence with the tools of evil. We decide. When confronted with evil or good, we still choose. We choose Heaven or hell. It's unfortunate that some love darkness. It's unfortunate that we of the light still have to share this world with that darkness. Regardless the storms that rage in this world, I know by experience, that God is always the safest place to be--that came from the experience of love and not any beast system. And, I have experienced both sides of the equation.

Jesus said today to CHOOSE whom you will serve, but PLEASE, stop blaming and ascribing evil to God--by His loving nature, He is not in that!

Anonymous said...

Re: 10:33 P.M.
I lived two blocks from the crash in Kenner La. It hit the ground at full throttle.The plane broke into lots of pieces. THE TAIL WAS STILL IDENTIFIABLE. As in all other crashes.There were bodies every where and body parts as well. There was luggage every where. Your credability is put into question when you said there was no body found and then said there was a foot in a shoe. You sound like one of the idiots working for the cabal,with a agenda and no brains.

Anonymous said...

Re: 7:31 A.M.
Bla- Bla-Bla Either God created everything are He didn't. If Man created evile than evile men have the same power as God and we don't have true free will. If we had two Earths and a means to travel to the one We chose (good or evil) then we We would have true free will. When you have evil men that God created and knew before hand and these men control churches,schools,media,entertainment and our ability to feed our selves and our families. Your argument makes no sense it's a weak fairy tale that helps the bad guys keep the brain washed confused.

Anonymous said...

Respectfully disagree with your comment. I make no argument, and I am confident my comment makes sense to those experienced and knowledgeable of godly (not religious) ways--those who understand with not just their head, but their heart (which is where the truth lives.)

Blaming God for creating evil is Old Testament learning & thinking. It's pulling scriptures out of context and adding meaning to them they do not have. And, if you have been a student of the Bible, you would understand this remark.

Now, I will make an argument that God did NOT create EVERYTHING. I will also add that MAN did NOT create EVIL. Darkness just is and always has been. God is the one who brought light to the darkness and form to the void. God created everything in the sense He created every GOOD thing. There is no need to have two Earths to have true free will, we have that right here and now. One person may travel most of their life in dark ways, become "enlightened" and CHOOSE to now travel in the light. That is true free will (AKA repentence.) A person who is created to be evil then has no free will to choose any other way of being. Evil men create themselves by their choices.

Good men who choose to be so also serve mankind through churches, (synagogues, mosques, temples) media, entertainment and the ability for us to feed ourselves and our families. Otherwise, evil would be have been unrestrained and would have overrun this world long ago.

Ignorance is also a kind of evil. God knows that his "...people perish for a lack of knowledge." Choosing to be ignorant (uneducated or unenlightened) makes one vulnerable to being brain-washed and confused. As in those who are awakened to the tactics of the cabal are going to see through false flag attempts to rob people of their freedom. Whereas those who are ignorant and naive to these ways are easiy manipulated emotionally and psychologically to give up their freedom for a false sense of security.

Ignorance keeps the brain-washed confused. Fairy tales teach valuable lessons.

If God truly created evil and evil men, then we would certainly have heard these evil doers praising and worshiping God for the gift of evil choice, yet, we find this is not so. This credit is given to another source considered quite evil.

Spiritual growth & maturity are a lifetime process. However, many choose not to educate themselves and by the time they reach advanced age when one would expect them to have gained wisdom--they have none. Your entire comment reveals to me you are lacking in spiritual education. However, I am impressed that you made this attempt at all and would encourage you to take your comment to the internet search engines and pose your questions there where a wealth of information awaits to challenge your mind & spirit.

Anonymous said...

Re: 206 A.M.
Your judgement of Me Is indicative Of your circular thought process. You are passing judgment on My spirituality.(only God has the right to judge) Your argument takes both sides of the issue. If God by Your admission did not create everything then He/she is not the God of the Bible or Christianity.
Thank You for Your response.