Find out what your neighbors teens are up to

American Women Are Becoming ISIS Wives   

In its quest to replace soldiers who are dying on the battlefield, ISIS has begun to recruit women from the West — including from America — in order to bear the group offspring. The organization refers to these children as “cubs of the Caliphate,” who it hopes will one day carry on the fight against the United States and its allies. These Western “lionesses of Allah” are thought to now amount to more than 600, and American intelligence agencies have warned that their numbers are rising.

Many of these women show no signs of being outraged or disgusted by the violent acts that the terrorist group is known for — in fact, in many cases, just the opposite is true. Most worrisome is that in a number of the known cases so far, the women appear to have been ordinary Americans or Britons who some residents would consider “the girl next door.”

In Vicksburg, Virginia, Jaelyn Delshaun Young, a 19-year-old ex-cheerleader and honors student was arrested when she attempted to travel to Syria to join ISIS as a potential bride. “I cannot wait to get to Dawlah [ISIS territory] so I can be amongst my brothers and sisters under the protection of Allah swt to raise little Dawlah cubs in sha Allah [God willing],” she wrote to FBI agents she believed to be members of ISIS. (The abbreviation “swt” is a shortening of a traditional Muslim phrase.) Young had recently converted to Islam and had applauded the 2015 terror attack on U.S. soldiers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

“What makes me feel better after just watching the news is that an akhi [brother] carried out an attack against U.S. Marines in TN! Alhamdulillah [praise Allah], the numbers of supporters are growing,” she wrote. The FBI was able to prove in court that Young had tried to help terrorists target regional U.S. airports, leading to a 12-year federal prison sentence for the young woman.

In suburban Arvada, Colorado, Shannon Maureen Conley was a 19-year-old trained nurse’s aide who wanted to travel to Syria to meet an ISIS suitor who she’d been in online contact with. Conley, who had converted to Islam, had taken to wearing a headscarf around her suburban neighborhood and had aroused suspicions of her neighbors and her parents, who discovered a one-way plane ticket to Turkey with their daughter’s name on it.

Conley had also been spotted firing rifles at a nearby shooting range and walking the grounds of a local “mega-church” taking notes and wearing a backpack. The church’s pastor alerted the FBI, which later questioned the teen. Conley “repeatedly referred to U.S. military bases as ‘targets,'” read the criminal complaint against her. “Conley said she needed to go overseas to be trained in jihad, but she did not need to be overseas to wage jihad.”

Conley had told the FBI that even children and women were “legitimate” targets if they happened to be visiting military bases. “It is OK to harm innocents if they are part of a target,” Conley said. The teen had also referred to attacking a government “motorcade” within the United States.

Conley was arrested at Denver International Airport trying to board a flight to Turkey and was charged with attempting to assist a terrorist organization. She later made a plea deal with the FBI that gave her a four-year reduced prison sentence in exchange for helping the bureau hunt for other Americans with similar intentions.

Former FBI chief James Comey has said that stopping homegrown radicalization via the Internet of Americans is a top priority for the bureau. He said that Syria is both a safe haven and a training ground for recruited Westerners, who often get involved in “the worst kind of relationships and [receive] the worst kind of training.”

In Britain, Sally Jones, a 49-year-old blond-haired former guitarist for the all-girl rock band Krunch is on a special-forces “kill list” for threatening the life of her country’s Queen Elizabeth II. The failed plot was to have taken place on an anniversary of World War II V-J Day in London. In addition, Jones was accused of two further plots, including a plan for a mass shooting at a concert in North Carolina and an attempt to livestream the murder of a U.S. soldier.

Jones had married an ISIS computer hacker named Junaid Hussain, who originally hailed from Birmingham, England. The pair traveled to Raqqa, Syria, where Hussain was killed by a U.S. military drone in 2015. Before his death, the two had become semi-celebrities in the world of ISIS, with both actively recruiting new members from the West. They had been nicknamed “Mr. and Mrs. Terror” by the organization.

Jones and Hussain had two children, one of whom is an 11-year-old boy thought to have been seen in a video in which ISIS youngsters executed captured Kurdish soldiers. Jones is currently believed to be hiding somewhere in Syria or Iraq.

For widows such as Jones, ISIS pays a lifelong stipend, labeling the women “shaheed,” or “wives of martyrs.” “U dnt have 2 pay 4 ANYTHING if u r shaheed,” wrote one Western convert in Syria. ISIS also pays the women to have children. For each “cub of the Caliphate” they deliver, they receive a $25-per-month award, in addition to a $400 maternity bonus and $500 marriage bonus.

But even more sickening is that the terrorist organization is recruiting the women to be suicide bombers or killers like Tashfeen Malik, the wife who helped her Muslim husband slaughter 14 of his innocent co-workers in San Bernardino, California in 2015.

A friend of Sally Jones named Umm Muthanna al-Britani tweeted that she wished to be “martyred in the cause of Allah,” stating, “I came [to Syria] to die. I will not leave till I get what I came here for: shahadah [martyrdom]… Everyone around me is getting shahadah. When will it be my turn?”

When the horrific terror attacks of November 2015 happened in Paris, Muthanna tweeted, “Wish I could have seen the hostages being slaughtered last night with my own eyes. Would have been beautiful… Burn, Paris, burn. LOL, HOW SCARED ARE THESE KUFFAR [non-believers].”

ISIS now incorporates into its marriage certificates language that states, “If the Prince of believers [ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi] consents to [a wife] carrying out a suicide mission, then her husband should not prohibit her.”

Terrorism experts say that women pose more of a security threat to Western targets because they arouse less suspicion. They can carry bombs or explosives strapped to their waists while appearing to be pregnant.

“The group is looking ahead to using female cadres for suicide missions,” said Anne Speckhard, the director of the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism in Washington, D.C.

For the FBI and other law enforcement sources, these are worrying trends that mean more may need to be done online to catch recruits before they act. “It seems unfathomable to most of us that a female would want to join ISIS, but their online propaganda has a major focus on twisting the concept of women’s rights,” noted Ryan Mauro, national security analyst with the Clarion Project and a professor of counterterrorism at Liberty University.

“You’ll see pictures of fully covered women with guns as if they’re treated as equals in jihad.” The reality, however, is much different, said Mauro, as ISIS is known for mass rape, sex slavery and other apocryphal offenses against women.

“NO SISTER leaves the comfort of their homes just to marry some man,” American ISIS convert Umm Waqqas wrote. “Muslims from all ages are leaving to live in a REAL Muslim country & live under the shades of Sharia [Islamic law].”

Mauro says that the theological angle is the real draw for Western women. “When you look at ISIS propaganda, it’s not just well-produced but well-referenced, with tons of references to Islamic verses and scholars,” he says.

“The propaganda presents researched arguments that enable ISIS recruiters to withstand scrutiny from a prospective recruit.

The ISIS caliphate is portrayed as an ideal society on earth where things are great, with women valued, morals upheld, social services that minimize insecurity and newcomers that are welcomed into the family,” he added.

“And you get to earn a ticket to paradise if you die standing against the infidel to preserve it.”

American Liberty Report
May 21 2017
http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/american-women-are-becoming-isis-wives/

Fingerprints can be stolen from photos

Did you know your fingerprints can be stolen from photos?

Meredyth Censullo

January 16, 2017

TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — Making a “duck face” in photos might not be the best look, but it’s not going to compromise your security. However, posing while flashing a peace sign, making the “V” for victory, or even giving a “thumbs up” might result in identity theft.

 

If your fingerprints are in focus, with strong lighting, hackers can recreate them. Then, those fingerprints can be used to log on to electronic devices, or access apps that are protected with fingerprint technology, such as banking websites.

Researchers at The National Institute of Informatics in Japan are studying the problem, and say improving smartphone technology is to blame. The researchers used a 20.4-mega pixel camera for a recent experiment. After taking a picture of a thumb, the researchers created the digit’s data. They found that fingerprint data was obtainable at a distance of three meters, or just under 10 feet away.

The National Institute of Informatics is developing a special film that can be attached to fingers, and will protect fingerprint data in photos. However, it may take another two years before the technology is available.

For now, avoiding flashing your fingertips is your best option.

http://wfla.com/2017/01/16/did-you-know-your-fingerprints-can-be-stolen-from-photos/

 

How negative is the media coverage?

Harvard study examines media coverage of Trump — and the results will blow you away          

 

A new study by Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy examines the media's coverage of the Trump administration and finds the coverage has been overwhelmingly negative. (Did they consult with SERCO - THE provider of 'news coverage' for all the controlled media? THAT would have answered the questions IF SERCO was to be honest about what they do.)

It doesn’t take a team of experts at Harvard University to reveal what you already know: Most of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets do not support President Donald Trump. But just how negative is the media coverage?  (Just how negative do those paying for the services of SERCO want it to be?)

 

That’s the question a new study by Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy attempts to answer, and the results are truly remarkable. ??!!

 

The study analyzed print news reports about Trump during his first 100 days in office appearing in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. It also examined the newscasts produced by CBS, CNN, Fox News, NBC, the Financial Times, BBC and Germany’s ARD.

 

According to Harvard professor Thomas Patterson, “Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity. Of news reports with a clear tone, negative reports outpaced positive ones by 80 percent to 20 percent. Trump’s coverage was unsparing. In no week did the coverage drop below 70 percent negative and it reached 90 percent negative at its peak.”

 

By comparison, Bill Clinton’s news coverage during his first 100 days was 60 percent negative, George W. Bush’s was 57 percent negative and Obama’s coverage was nearly three times more positive than Trump. According to Patterson, 59 percent of Obama’s coverage was positive in his first 100 days, while only 20 percent of Trump’s coverage was positive.

Among the news outlets examined, not one provided more positive coverage than negative coverage. Unsurprisingly, Fox News was the closest; 52 percent of its coverage of Trump was negative, and 48 percent was positive, suggesting the network’s “fair and balanced” slogan may be more accurate than is often alleged.

 

Ninety percent or more of the coverage at CNN, NBC and CBS was determined to be negative. The coverage by the New York Times and Washington Post was 80 percent negative or higher. Even the Wall Street Journal, which is considered to lean conservative, was determined to provide coverage of Trump that was 70 percent negative.

 

One unexpected finding from the study is that BBC’s coverage was 74 percent negative, lower than many of the top American news outlets.

 

Patterson wrote in the study Trump’s “best” week came when he ordered a cruise-missile strike on a Syrian airbase in retaliation against that government’s use of nerve gas.

 

“The best period for Trump was week 12 of his presidency, when he ordered a cruise missile strike on a Syrian airbase in retaliation for the Assad regime’s use of nerve gas on civilians. That week, his coverage divided 70 percent negative to 30 percent positive.” 
 

The study’s introduction indicates, “The newspaper analysis covers all sections except sports, obituaries, and letters to the editor. Op-eds and editorials are included, but letters from the public are not. For television, the analysis covers the full daily content of each network’s major newscast. Network talk shows are not included.”

(After reading the above and the explanation of how the percentages were calculated, and considering that SERCO is the hired NEGATIVE script writer and the SOLE SOURCE for ALL the 'news' media, it is not difficult to understand HOW all the NEGATIVE reports surface about Trump, not only since President Trump took office but BEFORE during the campaigning. The enemy is furious that Trump won, that Trump continues to be successful in undoing much of the damage they accomplished in the Bush, Clinton and Obama regimes, and that they are losing control. They are hell bent on doing all possible to literally destroy this man who has accomplished more in his efforts to undo their damage then they are even able to continue doing.  Too many independent conservative polls continue to show that as many as  90% of Americans polled fully support President Trump, demonstrating that the media is wholly owned and controlled by this nation's enemies and SERCO, and that the media that is NOT a part of the SERCO system has far differing results to publish.  This nation is sorely divided and at war with itself.)  

 

Justin Haskins 

May 20 2017
(H/T: Fox News Insider)

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/20/harvard-study-examines-media-coverage-of-trump-and-the-results-will-blow-you-away/

 

SAN DIEGO SAYS 'NO!' TO SHARIA LAW

 

SAN DIEGO FIGHTS BACK:

SAYS WE WILL NOT TOLERATE

SHARIA LAW IN OUR SCHOOLS

 



Saudis roll out the red carpet treatment for President Trump

Saudi Arabia: The Difference Between Trump and Obama – Red Carpet Welcome

 

Even Saudi camel jockeys can tell the difference between President Trump, a real leader commanding respect, and a paid pink pantywaist a*s kisser, Obama

 

While the idiot leftists, 'politicians' and traitors in both parties of Congress are bad mouthing and threatening to 'impeach,' world leaders recognize and respect full well the qualities of the great American leader President Trump

 

 

 

May 20, 2017

Kristie McDonald

 

 

President Trump got a royal, red-carpet welcome to Saudi Arabia on Saturday, where he was greeted at the airport by King Salman.

 



 

Trump shook hands with the Saudi king—a stark contrast to former President Obama, who bowed to Salman in 2009.

 

Saudi Arabia is the first stop on Trump’s whirlwind nine-day foreign tour, which will include stops in Israel, the Vatican, Belgium and the G7 summit in Italy.

Bizpac Review reports,

The president literally got the red-carpet treatment at the Riyadh airport, where the tarmac was lined with plush red carpets despite the 107degree heat.

 

Follow

Donald J. Trump

✔ @realDonaldTrump

Great to be in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Looking forward to the afternoon and evening ahead. #POTUSAbroad

4:44 AM - 20 May 2017    

Melania and Ivanka Trump accompanied the president, and made a statement by not covering their hair—which is almost unheard of in oppressive Saudi Arabia, where women must cover their heads in a hijab or niqab.

Hillary Clinton wore a headscarf during her visits to Saudi Arabia as secretary of state, where she bowed to a Saudi prince.

 

Spot the difference!!!

 

 

 



 

At long last Americans can be proud of our Presidential couple.

 

http://eheadlines.com/saudi-arabia-the-difference-between-trump-and-obama-red-carpet-welcome-video/

 

 

If Wannacry cyber attack didn’t make you wannacry, the next one will!

http://thegreatrecession.info/blog/wannacry-cyber-attack-warware/

The Wannacry malware that hit like a global mega-bomb, showed everyone how vulnerable we are to a global cyber attack. Billed as “one of the largest global ransomware attacks the cyber community has ever seen,” the infection started in London and then emerged almost instantly in Seattle, New York, and Tokyo. Within ten minutes, the coordinated attack became epidemic throughout the world, covering the better part of every continent but Antarctica. By the end of one day, the malware had infected over 200,000 computers in 150 nations, encrypting all their data and locking the users out.

While the attackers demanded a ransom in order to free hostage computers, the small number of companies that paid the ransom required for unlocking the encryption did not get their data back, raising a question of whether the primary goal was really money or mayhem. (If primary goal was making a lot of quick money, it would make more sense to quickly release data so that more companies would be inclined to pay the ransom, seeing that payment solved the problem.)

This was a cyber attack equal in scale to something Dr. Evil would create or some Bond villain would use to collect ransom from the entire world … or to control the world. This time, it didn’t win, but there are some interesting reasons why as you did deeper….

...The fact that ransom seems to have played a very small roll in a very large “ransomware” attack begs the question as to whether this was a government operation masquerading as a ransom attack...

—David Haggith